|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
   |
Posted - 2010.07.09 14:00:00 -
[1]
Thumbs down. This proposal makes no sense from beginning to end. Starting with the presumption that for some reason shields and armour should be treated the same.
-Jin Nib
Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since:
2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
|
Posted - 2010.07.11 15:45:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: megawinsausesniperproxxx
Sok, if i were you i would turn in that fancy CSM title. Whether you realize it or not, you represent thousands of people who play a complicated game. your job is not to troll, or offer input without careful consideration. you are supposed to be a voice of reason and measured debate.
nyouve pretty well disgraced the title, man 
Can someone please explain this attitude to me? Sok was posting before he was CSM and he'll probably continue to post afterwards as well. In addition where does the idea that CSM members can't have or express opinions and thoughts of their own come from? It's patently ridiculous. Especially considering that they ran on platforms constructed from their thoughts and ideas. Quite frankly I wish more CSM would be involved visibly with the assembly hall considering how central it should be to the council.
Anyways as someone who voted for Sok I am quite pleased with his representation so far. Would vote again.
-Jin Nib
Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since:
2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
|
Posted - 2010.07.13 23:07:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Maxsim Goratiev
shield-tank haters
Really that's a thing? Is it like racism or what?
Since you fail to make a cohesive argument for your nonsense, everyone disagreeing with you is doing it out of an irrational hatred of shields? Wow, the ego knows no bounds....
-Jin Nib
Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since:
2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
Jin Nib
Resplendent Knives
|
Posted - 2010.07.18 23:49:00 -
[4]
I don't really understand why a need is felt for Shields to be on the same footing as Armour or vise versa. They are different aspects of a ships health, but they are different, and should have different causes and effects and requirements. Can some one point out where he explained why Shields and Armour should be treated in a similar manner. He claims to have done so, but I cant find it. And given that it's an assumed premise upon which his whole proposal rests on I would think it would feature more predominantly in this thread (you know, rather then being completely nonexistent).
Also please don't confuse "how" with "why". It baffles me that anyone could confuse the two in the first place, but it seems to occur frequently enough.
-Jin Nib
Trading on behalf of Opera Noir since:
2009.03.02 03:53:00
|
|
|
| |
|